I have not seen a single thread or post that confirms that H2 without O2 has any benefits. (I have not read all the threads or even close)

Can anyone confirm a benefit for H2 only usage over HHO?

I have spent an enormous amount of time ( not to mention money) developing a cell that 100% separates H2 from o2 @ a significant enough production ( 1L/min.) and to no avail--have it on 2 vehicles with very little in the way of results, meaning some increase in performance but no MPG.

Good to know

The evidence Ive seen (other folks testing stuff) showed that H2 alone had the same O2 sensor issues as HHO. This makes since to me for a number of reasons.
So I'm just curious if anybody has some other positive experience with just H2. You getting some performance increase is good to hear.

check this thread.

http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-H2-Results

(10-27-2009 09:21 AM)bsmart Wrote:  check this thread.

http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-H2-Results

I read that one already, and many others like it. That is why I'm asking the question "is are there any positive MPG reports from using H2 only systems? I continue to see folks taking on the task of attempting to separate H2 form O2, thinking there going to somehow not need EFIE's... I think we need to be letting them know that there is no benefit for all that effort.

Now if folks are interested in H2 only, playing with cracking Urea, has BIG possibilities. Even OU possabilities

Check out hydrodine's results. http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Hydroge...Results-H2

He built some very impressive hho cells and got no results until he switched to h2.

(10-27-2009 12:46 PM)colchiro Wrote:  Check out hydrodine's results. http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Hydroge...Results-H2

He built some very impressive hho cells and got no results until he switched to h2.

Great link, thats what im looking for Thanks.

Hope you find it worthwhile.