<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Fuel-Saver Forums - All Forums]]></title>
		<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Fuel-Saver Forums - http://www.fuel-saver.org]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:57:46 -0700</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Injection at PCV valve ?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Injection-at-PCV-valve</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 03:59:26 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jbalat</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Injection-at-PCV-valve</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Guys,<br />
as I increase the amps my car starts running rougher<br />
<br />
one theory is that the engine is getting steam, my other theory is that because I am injecting before the MAF then the MAF is getting bubbles of air which makes it run rough ?<br />
<br />
Anyway what do you think about injection using a t-piece just before the intake into the pcv line ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Guys,<br />
as I increase the amps my car starts running rougher<br />
<br />
one theory is that the engine is getting steam, my other theory is that because I am injecting before the MAF then the MAF is getting bubbles of air which makes it run rough ?<br />
<br />
Anyway what do you think about injection using a t-piece just before the intake into the pcv line ?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Company runs truck on 100% hydroxy]]></title>
			<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Company-runs-truck-on-100-hydroxy</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 02:41:44 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Zipstor</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Company-runs-truck-on-100-hydroxy</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://pesn.com/2010/08/10/9501686_Future_Energy_runs_truck_on_100_Percent_Hydroxy/" target="_blank">http://pesn.com/2010/08/10/9501686_Futur...t_Hydroxy/</a><br />
<br />
I'm wondering where is all that supposively compressed hho that he uses to accelerate.... Check out his website there are a couple of good ideas to try out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://pesn.com/2010/08/10/9501686_Future_Energy_runs_truck_on_100_Percent_Hydroxy/" target="_blank">http://pesn.com/2010/08/10/9501686_Futur...t_Hydroxy/</a><br />
<br />
I'm wondering where is all that supposively compressed hho that he uses to accelerate.... Check out his website there are a couple of good ideas to try out.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Do I have a narrow band or wide band O2?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Do-I-have-a-narrow-band-or-wide-band-O2</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:38:22 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hector100</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Do-I-have-a-narrow-band-or-wide-band-O2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi: I've just finish the installation of my dry cell in my malibu 2001. I have this set up: 13 plates 3.5" X 3.5" 316L plates +NNNNN-NNNNN+, which is producing 1.5 LPM. at 20 AMPs running not too hot. now, I guess I need to install an EFIE (digital preferably with LCD for reading values). but I'm not sure what kind of o2 sensors I have, there is one pre cat and one post cat, both four wires, I've read that I need to tread the pre cat sensor only. so, any help will be appreciated. thanks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi: I've just finish the installation of my dry cell in my malibu 2001. I have this set up: 13 plates 3.5" X 3.5" 316L plates +NNNNN-NNNNN+, which is producing 1.5 LPM. at 20 AMPs running not too hot. now, I guess I need to install an EFIE (digital preferably with LCD for reading values). but I'm not sure what kind of o2 sensors I have, there is one pre cat and one post cat, both four wires, I've read that I need to tread the pre cat sensor only. so, any help will be appreciated. thanks.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Before I buy!]]></title>
			<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Before-I-buy</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 19:44:48 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>SloobyLoo</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Before-I-buy</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[This is a screen grab from ODB2007, it is from my 2009 Subaru Forester 2.5 Non Turbo. I am 99% sure that the wide band digital EFIE for the A/F and possibly the analogue one for the O2 is what I need. This is a belts and braces question, does this all look right? I would hate to damage my newish car!<br />
<br />
I am using it to lean out an LPG  system that is running slightly too rich.<br />
<br />
Thanks<br />
SL]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is a screen grab from ODB2007, it is from my 2009 Subaru Forester 2.5 Non Turbo. I am 99% sure that the wide band digital EFIE for the A/F and possibly the analogue one for the O2 is what I need. This is a belts and braces question, does this all look right? I would hate to damage my newish car!<br />
<br />
I am using it to lean out an LPG  system that is running slightly too rich.<br />
<br />
Thanks<br />
SL]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Ford f-150]]></title>
			<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Ford-f-150</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:23:04 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bone3160</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Ford-f-150</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I own a 95 Ford F-150 I was having a bad smeel underhood!!!I figured out it was a bad stock vapor canister....Replaced with a new one.My question is I had dual exhaust put on getting rid of cat.I am NOT running a hydrogen cell yet.But now is burning to rich will I be safe to put 2 spark plug non-foulers in front of the o2 sensor ......will this lean out the engine to much without alternative fuel??????????Any help would be appreciated<img src="http://www.fuel-saver.org/images/smilies/SoftBlue/biggrin.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Big Grin" title="Big Grin" /> I only have 1 o2 sensor !!!!!!!!!!!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I own a 95 Ford F-150 I was having a bad smeel underhood!!!I figured out it was a bad stock vapor canister....Replaced with a new one.My question is I had dual exhaust put on getting rid of cat.I am NOT running a hydrogen cell yet.But now is burning to rich will I be safe to put 2 spark plug non-foulers in front of the o2 sensor ......will this lean out the engine to much without alternative fuel??????????Any help would be appreciated<img src="http://www.fuel-saver.org/images/smilies/SoftBlue/biggrin.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Big Grin" title="Big Grin" /> I only have 1 o2 sensor !!!!!!!!!!!!!]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ignition wire diagram]]></title>
			<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-ignition-wire-diagram</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 11:11:25 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>schooler23</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-ignition-wire-diagram</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[im looking for the color code on the ignition wires for 85 mereceds 300D]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[im looking for the color code on the ignition wires for 85 mereceds 300D]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[2000 Honda Accord MPG gains disappearing]]></title>
			<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-2000-Honda-Accord-MPG-gains-disappearing</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 06:45:54 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>SteveO</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-2000-Honda-Accord-MPG-gains-disappearing</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I installed a wide band Efie on my 2000 honda accord after I found out it was a car with California emissions , I had a narrow band on there before with some small gains 28 mpg  w/o 31- 32 mpg with, but check engine light was always on. <br />
My front O2 sensor went bad so I replaced it and when I did I found out it was a wide band sensor. So I put a wide band Efie on it and also treated the secondary sensor. No check engine light now.  Initially I got real good results (test 1) 49.2 mpg  ( test 2 ) 41.7 mpg  ( test 3)   34.7mpg <br />
(test 4) 34.58 mpg  (test 5)  31.53 mpg  (test 6)  29.04 mpg . <br />
 My wide band Efie  is tuned between 1/4 and the 1/2 mark and the rear Efie is tuned at about 200 milivolts although it was jumping around a little yesterday. These tests were over the period of a week and pretty much the same roads and driving conditions , same gas station and pump .<br />
 Do I need to replace the rear sensor or do I need to treat the   map/maf sensor ?  Any ideas ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I installed a wide band Efie on my 2000 honda accord after I found out it was a car with California emissions , I had a narrow band on there before with some small gains 28 mpg  w/o 31- 32 mpg with, but check engine light was always on. <br />
My front O2 sensor went bad so I replaced it and when I did I found out it was a wide band sensor. So I put a wide band Efie on it and also treated the secondary sensor. No check engine light now.  Initially I got real good results (test 1) 49.2 mpg  ( test 2 ) 41.7 mpg  ( test 3)   34.7mpg <br />
(test 4) 34.58 mpg  (test 5)  31.53 mpg  (test 6)  29.04 mpg . <br />
 My wide band Efie  is tuned between 1/4 and the 1/2 mark and the rear Efie is tuned at about 200 milivolts although it was jumping around a little yesterday. These tests were over the period of a week and pretty much the same roads and driving conditions , same gas station and pump .<br />
 Do I need to replace the rear sensor or do I need to treat the   map/maf sensor ?  Any ideas ?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Construction switch,pressure 3056344]]></title>
			<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Construction-switch-pressure-3056344</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:08:17 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>cqcummins</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Construction-switch-pressure-3056344</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Construction switch,pressure<br />
3056344<br />
Construction switch,pressure 3056344<br />
cummins service parts switch,pressure,Construction switch,pressure use for Power Equipment engine , Construction switch,pressure of used equipment diesel , Construction switch,pressure for Road Machinery cummins<img src="http://pic.cqkms.com/cummins/912/91200--Electrical%20items%20by%20category/91201---alarm%20switch-/3056344/3056344--003.jpg" border="0" alt="[Image: 3056344--003.jpg&#93;" /><img src="http://pic.cqkms.com/cummins/912/91200--Electrical%20items%20by%20category/91201---alarm%20switch-/3056344/3056344--005.jpg" border="0" alt="[Image: 3056344--005.jpg&#93;" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Construction switch,pressure<br />
3056344<br />
Construction switch,pressure 3056344<br />
cummins service parts switch,pressure,Construction switch,pressure use for Power Equipment engine , Construction switch,pressure of used equipment diesel , Construction switch,pressure for Road Machinery cummins<img src="http://pic.cqkms.com/cummins/912/91200--Electrical%20items%20by%20category/91201---alarm%20switch-/3056344/3056344--003.jpg" border="0" alt="[Image: 3056344--003.jpg]" /><img src="http://pic.cqkms.com/cummins/912/91200--Electrical%20items%20by%20category/91201---alarm%20switch-/3056344/3056344--005.jpg" border="0" alt="[Image: 3056344--005.jpg]" />]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Occasional black smoke from exhaust]]></title>
			<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Occasional-black-smoke-from-exhaust</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:25:04 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>enterprise</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Occasional-black-smoke-from-exhaust</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I can tune the the EFIE to get a smooth tick-over, but on acceleration  and when running at about 50-55 MPH I get some black smoke sometimes for the exhaust. Also I am not getting better mileage, it may even be slightly worse.<br />
When I increase revs the voltage goes down. when I try to tune the enhancer the the voltage goes down.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I can tune the the EFIE to get a smooth tick-over, but on acceleration  and when running at about 50-55 MPH I get some black smoke sometimes for the exhaust. Also I am not getting better mileage, it may even be slightly worse.<br />
When I increase revs the voltage goes down. when I try to tune the enhancer the the voltage goes down.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[volo chips]]></title>
			<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-volo-chips--3251</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 19:05:29 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Zipstor</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-volo-chips--3251</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I have been researching on that volo chip thing and did not find their website, all I have found is pages with people saying how great it is but no technical description.<br />
<br />
So what is it? What does it do? Is there a manufacturer website somewhere with all the appropriate specs and data? Is it like an EFiE? Does it leans out the fuel mixture?<br />
<br />
If anyone knows please let me know.<br />
<br />
Cheers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have been researching on that volo chip thing and did not find their website, all I have found is pages with people saying how great it is but no technical description.<br />
<br />
So what is it? What does it do? Is there a manufacturer website somewhere with all the appropriate specs and data? Is it like an EFiE? Does it leans out the fuel mixture?<br />
<br />
If anyone knows please let me know.<br />
<br />
Cheers.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Smokey Yunick]]></title>
			<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Smokey-Yunick</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:59:22 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>justing</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Smokey-Yunick</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[This months Hot Rod magazine has an article on Smokey Yunick and his hot vapor Fiero]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[This months Hot Rod magazine has an article on Smokey Yunick and his hot vapor Fiero]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Max current]]></title>
			<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Max-current</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:10:34 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Zipstor</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Max-current</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi there,<br />
<br />
I'm looking for the maximum theoretical amount of current I can pull with a dry cell. Dustin, the Smack just told me 500mA per square inch... My cell is has 6x6 plates, 9 plates that's 324 square inches therefore 162A max<br />
<br />
Isn't that a bit much don't you reckon?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi there,<br />
<br />
I'm looking for the maximum theoretical amount of current I can pull with a dry cell. Dustin, the Smack just told me 500mA per square inch... My cell is has 6x6 plates, 9 plates that's 324 square inches therefore 162A max<br />
<br />
Isn't that a bit much don't you reckon?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Save your documents..]]></title>
			<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Save-your-documents</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 23:53:26 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Gregrose</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Save-your-documents</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[It’s hard to store documents and its getting problem in my office. Boxes of files had been destroyed, it’s getting worse. I had heard of <a href="http://www.shredmonkey.net/" target="_blank">Paper Shredding Service</a> before, so I had called them. Now I’m free of these documents and so with my office. These guys are taking care of my documents. To preserve my documents <span style="font-weight: bold;">Paper Shredding</span> helps me lot. I think every office had the same problems like me so I want to suggest this for you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[It’s hard to store documents and its getting problem in my office. Boxes of files had been destroyed, it’s getting worse. I had heard of <a href="http://www.shredmonkey.net/" target="_blank">Paper Shredding Service</a> before, so I had called them. Now I’m free of these documents and so with my office. These guys are taking care of my documents. To preserve my documents <span style="font-weight: bold;">Paper Shredding</span> helps me lot. I think every office had the same problems like me so I want to suggest this for you.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[HHO bubbling fails]]></title>
			<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-HHO-bubbling-fails</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:07:39 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>chris0147</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-HHO-bubbling-fails</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi guys,<br />
<br />
I am new on the forum. As I would like you to advice me how to make the bubblers in the water. There are no bubblers in the water, I have got 12v battery which it has got a lot of power in it. I uses the scraps instead of used the ring terminals, which it had fails to produce the electrical in the parallel circuits. So I uses the scraps right now which I can now see the electrical get through it, but there are still no bubblers...<br />
<br />
<br />
I'd find it strange why it fails. There should have been bubblers in the water after I made the electrical get through in the circuits.<br />
<br />
<br />
Anyone advice me how to get it right and I also needs some safety tips while I will be working on it... <br />
<br />
<br />
Thanks!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi guys,<br />
<br />
I am new on the forum. As I would like you to advice me how to make the bubblers in the water. There are no bubblers in the water, I have got 12v battery which it has got a lot of power in it. I uses the scraps instead of used the ring terminals, which it had fails to produce the electrical in the parallel circuits. So I uses the scraps right now which I can now see the electrical get through it, but there are still no bubblers...<br />
<br />
<br />
I'd find it strange why it fails. There should have been bubblers in the water after I made the electrical get through in the circuits.<br />
<br />
<br />
Anyone advice me how to get it right and I also needs some safety tips while I will be working on it... <br />
<br />
<br />
Thanks!]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[hho injection]]></title>
			<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-hho-injection</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:07:53 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Razzy</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-hho-injection</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Is it possible to use lpg injectors to inject h2 staright into the silinders ?<img src="http://www.fuel-saver.org/images/smilies/SoftBlue/blink.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Confused" title="Confused" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Is it possible to use lpg injectors to inject h2 staright into the silinders ?<img src="http://www.fuel-saver.org/images/smilies/SoftBlue/blink.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Confused" title="Confused" />]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[using hydrogen system with efie i need help]]></title>
			<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-using-hydrogen-system-with-efie-i-need-help</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 20:49:13 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>rrcolburn</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-using-hydrogen-system-with-efie-i-need-help</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Does anybody own a 2001 Toyota Tacoma 2wd 4cyl. If so I could really<br />
use your help. Thank you<br />
<br />
Here is the way I have this wired and connected:<br />
<br />
From the two terminals on top of the generator:<br />
<br />
1 wire - negative terminal of battery<br />
1 wire - ammeter<br />
<br />
From the EFIE:<br />
<br />
green wire - electronic control module<br />
black wire - ground<br />
red wire - generator(which is where i get kinda <br />
  confused because theres only two connections for <br />
  three wires. So what goes where?<br />
 <br />
From the relay: <br />
<br />
blue wire - fuse wire -fuse - to the positive<br />
  terminal of the battery<br />
Yellow wire -ammeter<br />
black wire - ground<br />
<br />
2001 Toyota Tacoma 2wd automatic 4cyl.<br />
When your looking at the ecm from the passenger seat its my understanding the first group of wires is group D then C then B then A. If i did this right the sensor wire(the green wire from the efie) is out of group C(because it produced approximately 3.o -3.? v and is pink in color and is connected like a Y.<br />
<br />
My question is how do the wires connect to the generator?<br />
I have 3 wires and 2 terminals?<br />
<br />
Did I choose the correct wire from the ecm?<br />
<br />
What type of connector should I use to connect the clear tubing to the air intake which is after the maf/sensor?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Does anybody own a 2001 Toyota Tacoma 2wd 4cyl. If so I could really<br />
use your help. Thank you<br />
<br />
Here is the way I have this wired and connected:<br />
<br />
From the two terminals on top of the generator:<br />
<br />
1 wire - negative terminal of battery<br />
1 wire - ammeter<br />
<br />
From the EFIE:<br />
<br />
green wire - electronic control module<br />
black wire - ground<br />
red wire - generator(which is where i get kinda <br />
  confused because theres only two connections for <br />
  three wires. So what goes where?<br />
 <br />
From the relay: <br />
<br />
blue wire - fuse wire -fuse - to the positive<br />
  terminal of the battery<br />
Yellow wire -ammeter<br />
black wire - ground<br />
<br />
2001 Toyota Tacoma 2wd automatic 4cyl.<br />
When your looking at the ecm from the passenger seat its my understanding the first group of wires is group D then C then B then A. If i did this right the sensor wire(the green wire from the efie) is out of group C(because it produced approximately 3.o -3.? v and is pink in color and is connected like a Y.<br />
<br />
My question is how do the wires connect to the generator?<br />
I have 3 wires and 2 terminals?<br />
<br />
Did I choose the correct wire from the ecm?<br />
<br />
What type of connector should I use to connect the clear tubing to the air intake which is after the maf/sensor?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[dry cell mounting position]]></title>
			<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-dry-cell-mounting-position</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:39:39 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>mikehallbackhoe</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-dry-cell-mounting-position</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[can a dry cell be mounted in any position? is horizontal better than vertical ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[can a dry cell be mounted in any position? is horizontal better than vertical ?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[sensor control]]></title>
			<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-sensor-control</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:32:24 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tobbias</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-sensor-control</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I have a dry cell and tank installed and just came to the conclusion that I need a EFIE and just ordered one.  Do I also need to get a MAP sensor control for the hho.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have a dry cell and tank installed and just came to the conclusion that I need a EFIE and just ordered one.  Do I also need to get a MAP sensor control for the hho.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Engine cut-off switch]]></title>
			<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Engine-cut-off-switch</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:54:41 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Mika</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-Engine-cut-off-switch</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi.<br />
<br />
I'd like to share my new experience with you, I have been playing with ignition key and switched the ignition off and switched the gear to neutral when there's a downhill.<br />
<br />
Guess what. On the first trip I tried it, there's a road where my car uses normally 6.5l/100km (according to car computer) when I drive easily. Now, when switching the engine off when needed and rolled downhill, the consumption was only <span style="font-weight: bold;">5.0l/100km</span>!<br />
<br />
I think it would be worth it to make a ignition cut-off button to the gearshift so that the engine could be turned off when not needed. I calculated that I saved about two euros on that trip which only was 120 km...<br />
<br />
I would not recommend this to your big trucks and suv:s, because when engine is off, so is power steering, and the vacuum in your brake booster won't last many brakings and a big truck would be difficult to stop after that. But on a small or medium size car, you can easily handle it on speed without engine running. My car is 1250 kg and has (too) heavy 17' wheels and there's no problem. <img src="http://www.fuel-saver.org/images/smilies/SoftBlue/smile.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Smile" title="Smile" /><br />
<br />
Also, if you play around with your ignition key, don't forget to turn the ignition on after turning off the engine, or your steering wheel might lock. <img src="http://www.fuel-saver.org/images/smilies/SoftBlue/biggrin.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Big Grin" title="Big Grin" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi.<br />
<br />
I'd like to share my new experience with you, I have been playing with ignition key and switched the ignition off and switched the gear to neutral when there's a downhill.<br />
<br />
Guess what. On the first trip I tried it, there's a road where my car uses normally 6.5l/100km (according to car computer) when I drive easily. Now, when switching the engine off when needed and rolled downhill, the consumption was only <span style="font-weight: bold;">5.0l/100km</span>!<br />
<br />
I think it would be worth it to make a ignition cut-off button to the gearshift so that the engine could be turned off when not needed. I calculated that I saved about two euros on that trip which only was 120 km...<br />
<br />
I would not recommend this to your big trucks and suv:s, because when engine is off, so is power steering, and the vacuum in your brake booster won't last many brakings and a big truck would be difficult to stop after that. But on a small or medium size car, you can easily handle it on speed without engine running. My car is 1250 kg and has (too) heavy 17' wheels and there's no problem. <img src="http://www.fuel-saver.org/images/smilies/SoftBlue/smile.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Smile" title="Smile" /><br />
<br />
Also, if you play around with your ignition key, don't forget to turn the ignition on after turning off the engine, or your steering wheel might lock. <img src="http://www.fuel-saver.org/images/smilies/SoftBlue/biggrin.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Big Grin" title="Big Grin" />]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[EFIE Question]]></title>
			<link>http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-EFIE-Question--3239</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:00:14 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>SloobyLoo</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuel-saver.org/Thread-EFIE-Question--3239</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi,<br />
<br />
I have a slightly different use for the EFIE than the HHO norm around here, my car runs on LPG and Petrol. While running on LPG the AFR sensor returns readings that cause the cars ECU to run the car too rich on LPG. I want to apply a correctional voltage to the AFR signal while the LPG system is on.<br />
<br />
I have looked at the Dual Wide Band EFIE and I can see how to hook it up but it appears to me that there is no place to hook up the incoming signal to the ECU. Am I correct in thinking that the EFIE does not apply a correctional voltage but in fact generates a completely separate and autonomous signal? I actually want to correct the signal by x% some of the time (while on LPG) but otherwise have the thing running as normal.<br />
<br />
Making sense?<br />
<br />
Thanks in advance.<br />
<br />
S]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi,<br />
<br />
I have a slightly different use for the EFIE than the HHO norm around here, my car runs on LPG and Petrol. While running on LPG the AFR sensor returns readings that cause the cars ECU to run the car too rich on LPG. I want to apply a correctional voltage to the AFR signal while the LPG system is on.<br />
<br />
I have looked at the Dual Wide Band EFIE and I can see how to hook it up but it appears to me that there is no place to hook up the incoming signal to the ECU. Am I correct in thinking that the EFIE does not apply a correctional voltage but in fact generates a completely separate and autonomous signal? I actually want to correct the signal by x% some of the time (while on LPG) but otherwise have the thing running as normal.<br />
<br />
Making sense?<br />
<br />
Thanks in advance.<br />
<br />
S]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>